By MERCY NALUGO
Posted Friday, March 1 2013 at 02:00
Posted Friday, March 1 2013 at 02:00
MPs yesterday voted to ban widow inheritance, and made it an
offence for a spouse to demand for a refund of bride price as they
entered into the final stages of writing a law governing marriage.
The House adopted amendments to the Marriage and
Divorce Bill amidst protests from some members who walked out of
Parliament, saying the Bill should be stayed for two more months to
allow them consult their constituents.
Speaker Rebecca Kadaga, however, ruled that the
debate should go on, saying the Bill had stalled since 1960. She added
that there was nothing MPs wanted to consult about widow inheritance,
since the practice was known.
Clause 13 of the Bill, which was unanimously
adopted yesterday, now makes it an offence to marry a widow through the
practice of inheritance without her consent.
The law now makes bride price non-refundable.
Women activists had demanded that bride price, which they said had been
commercialised, should be banned since it put women at the risk of being
battered by their husbands who regarded them as property.
Resolved
The age of consent for marriage was placed at 18 years.
The age of consent for marriage was placed at 18 years.
Earlier in the day, women legislators met and
agreed to have a contentious clause seeking to recognise the mutual
rights of cohabiting partners to property after termination of a
relationship deleted. By press time, this matter had not yet been
considered.
Most MPs say cohabitation is not a recognised form
of marriage, and that legalising it would negatively impact on the
family unit.
The Uganda Women Parliamentary Association (UWOPA)
agreed to communicate their final position to the Speaker and to the
Attorney General.
During a workshop chaired by Ms Betty Amongi (Oyam
South), UWOPA members instead suggested that a separate law be put in
place to legislate for property rights under cohabitation. They said
cohabiting is rife.
Mityana Woman MP Sylvia Namabidde opened up debate
over the matter yesterday, and urged fellow MPs to delete the clause,
which she said had created suspicion among religious leaders who say
recognising cohabitation was legislating for crime.
“Why should we legislate for the rights of people
whose status is not recognised by the law? Whereas we recognise the fact
that many people cohabit, we should have a separate law for them and
not mix up issues, “suggested Ms Flavia Kabahenda (Kyegegwa District
Women).
Ms Gertrude Nakabira (Lwengo Women MP) noted that
legalising cohabitation would mean going against church preaching that
encourage believers to embrace the sacrament of matrimony.
“Me as a parent, l can’t support cohabitation
because it means am supporting outright prostitution. We should not
encourage our children to go against the church laws,” she said.
Not recognised
Ms Alice Alaso (Serere women) and Mariam Nalubega (Gomba) also backed their colleagues saying cohabitation is not a recognised form of marriage.
The Bill also legislates for the sharing of matrimonial property after divorce, but male MPs say women are targeting their properties.
Ms Alice Alaso (Serere women) and Mariam Nalubega (Gomba) also backed their colleagues saying cohabitation is not a recognised form of marriage.
The Bill also legislates for the sharing of matrimonial property after divorce, but male MPs say women are targeting their properties.
The Bill is a break-away from the original Domestic Relations
Bill which was rejected by the Muslim community, forcing Cabinet to
separate the law for Muslims and Christians.
Debate on the Bill resumes next week on Tuesday.
mnalugo@ug.nationmedia.com
Accessed on Friday March 1, 2013 from: http://www.monitor.co.ug/News/National/Heated-debate-as-MPs-ban-bride-price-refund/-/688334/1707874/-/item/0/-/kx0028/-/index.html
Accessed on Friday March 1, 2013 from: http://www.monitor.co.ug/News/National/Heated-debate-as-MPs-ban-bride-price-refund/-/688334/1707874/-/item/0/-/kx0028/-/index.html